As it turns out, the housing market is reportedly stabilizing as we, among many others, have been talking about for the past couple months. The interesting portion about this is where the stability is being derived from. From what we can see, there’s a large number of investors putting their money into luxury real estate…but that’s about it. A news clip from CNBC stated that 24% of Americans making over $450,000/year are in the market for real estate (more specifically luxury real estate) which is a substancial 7% increase since last year. The market has of course bottomed and started to show signs of stability, but the only people who seem to be able to afford taking advantage of this situation are the people who were never really affected by it in the first place.

Low interest rates, low prices, and promise of market improvement is any investor’s dream, but what about the rest of the population that doesn’t even come close to making that sort of coin? Heck, Canada’s housing prices still haven’t even bottomed, and are expected to drop another 10% over the next two to three years. So, while wealthy investors, foreign and domestic, take advantage of this situation, there seems to be no weight being thrown around by the “average” social classes, which is kind of a scary thought. Why? Because when a market cheapens up, if there’s only a small population of people who can afford to have a piece of the pie, it makes for a really unbalanced property market. Yes, it contributes to market recovery, but if luxury properties are the only ones being circulated to seemingly increase their value, while making no contribution to evening out the rest of the market, it may lead to another collapse down the road.

New mortgage rates in the US are dropping to try and increase purchasing rates and entice new buyers, which is great, but in Canada they’re going up…and they’re cutting mortgages shorter to boot, pushing new buyers even further away from their purchasing goals. Homes and properties are being purchased, but the way this is weighted doesn’t spell good news looking down the road. If the rich get richer, while the rest of us scrape our change together to make the same level of purchases, the market won’t stabilize. Keep in mind that renting rates are going up in conjunction with available properties instead of the ideal situation of new buyers rising in conjunction with increasingly available properties. Collectively, this doesn’t exactly scream “recovering market” as much as it does “impending monopoly”.

article originally published via EstateVue

photo courtesy of f_shields

Calling all agents – we have a situation on our hands. A recent website, http://bidcomhomes.com/, has taken the real estate world by surprise, and is changing the structures of how you guys are making your commission.

Once upon a time, Giorgio Lupinacci asked some of his real estate agent friends if they’d lower their commission rate when he was looking at selling his property. To his surprise, none of them agreed to his proposition, so he took matters into his own hands and started bigcomhomes.com – a website where agents bid their commission rates on user-submitted listings in hopes to find an agent who’s willing to provide their clients with a more discounted rate than the standard format in BC: “seven per cent on the first $100,000 and 3.5 per cent on the remainder of the sale price”.

This website’s concept is raising some pulses in the real estate game, as it’s directly threatening the more or less monopolized MLS system, and the accustomed livelihood of many agents. Agents, we want to know what you think of this game changing website. Will only “certain types” of agents be using this service, or could this lead to the creation of an even more competitive market? Does this platform show potential for expansion? How would you feel about commission rates being more competitive altogether, should this concept catch on?

Let us know your answers on Twitter by using the hashtag #commissionproblems, or by commenting below. We’d love to hear your thoughts on this.

 

photo courtesy of CarbonNYC

The Ultimate Real Estate Marketing and Back Office Solution

EnviroMint is pleased to announce its new partnership with EstateVue – a leading marketing agency that combines technology, design, and an intimate knowledge of the real estate industry, to provide brokers, agent and banners with an ever-evolving marketing suite delivering proven results. EnviroMint is a real estate back office accounting and business management software system that centralizes each brokerage’s information, thus improving efficiency and drastically cutting down on paper waste.

This newly minted relationship will enable both companies to offer an entire collection of front and back office services under one roof, a rarity in the real estate industry. With this alliance in place, a total solution is now available for a more effective real estate marketing investment for brokers and agents alike. Combining EstateVue’s marketing expertise and supreme service with EnviroMint’s efficiency solutions and next-level business software is a dream team combination for any real estate professional looking to boost their marketing, reduce operational costs, and be more eco-friendly.

Both firms regularly update their tools, processes, and technology to ensure that they consistently evolve with new advancements, and apply these to their clients’ advantage. Their verified track record demonstrates that they are pillars in their designated industries; together, they form a winning combination with sought after tool sets in the real estate sector.

EnviroMint is located in Winnipeg, MB, Canada and provides real estate back office document, business and management software throughout Canada.

EstateVue is headquartered in Kelowna, BC, Canada and provides marketing, technology and IDX services to agents, brokerages and banners throughout Central and Western Canada, Western regions of the USA and the UK.

For more information on this partnership please contact:

Marc Labossiere – EnviroMint, CEO
marc.labossiere@enviromint.co
1 (855) 534 8080
www.enviromint.co

 

Cory Alexander – EstateVue, Sales Director
cory@estatevue.com
1 (877) 762 9453
www.estatevue.com

 

 

 

 

 

 

Okay, so a month ago canadian mortgage laws were announced to be changed in a very drastic way. We even wrote a post about it –> http://www.realestateaccountingsoftware.ca/industry-news/buyers-beware/. Read it. You know you want to. Anyhow…when we originally wrote this post we did so in the form of a warning, with even the title being Buyers Beware. However, our warning, nor any other warnings, seem to be reaching the public on a large enough scale, which is a concerning notion.

The impending changes were announced June 20th, and when a survey took place between June 29th and July 4th, it unveiled that only 45% of Canadians are aware of the changes taking place. Not even half the country’s aware, which is quite upsetting…maybe the government needs to give our marketing guys a call to help get the word out when things this important happen. You’d think that there would be bigger efforts put forth to see that these changes were broadly understood…but apparently not.

To give you guys a re-cap, on July 9th, the maximum amortization length has been shortened from a 30 year maximum, to a 25 year maximum, with lenders also being limited to only providing home equity loans that cover 80% of the home’s value, as opposed to 85%. These little increments of 5 are a lot scarier than you’d think, especially for new home buyers, who are (those who know about these changes anyways) in relative awe at how much these changes will affect them. Not only do new buyers have to come up with an extra 5% for their down payment – which, if you were looking at purchasing a $500,000 home, your down payment down payment amount just increased from $75,000 to $100,000., and there’s absolutely nothing you can do about it – but they also need to pay back this amount 5 years faster than before. The whole situation’s frankly sticky, especially since the government’s reason for doing this is to attempt home ownerships from being drawn out and to aid citizens in achieving their long-term goals…which is seemingly ironic, considering that these new laws will inhibit people from even beginning to reach their long term goals.

Feel free to share this article with fellow Canadians to ensure that the word is out about these changes to that buyers can be prepared. If you have any other comments we’d love to hear them, so join the conversation with us on Twitter.

 

Roaming around the internet today, we stumbled into a prominent theme: real estate recovery. A few articles we found were making statements about the market’s recovery, but only pertaining to North America, which, frankly isn’t a very broad spectrum. So we did some digging and Property Wire, a global real estate news website, had all the answers we needed. Donning nearly every section of the globe were headlines declaring the recovery of the real estate market, or at least alluded to contributing factors which could lead you to the same conclusion.

Yes, ladies and gentlemen, real estate is seemingly recovering on a global scale, which is a very exciting notion. We’ve been waiting for this day for quite some time, and it’s looking like everything’s going to sort itself out soon. We can see signs of improvement in Dubai, Egypt, England, The US, and Canada all in the form of property price and sale increases, showing the increasing stability the global market’s encountered. We may just be alright after all…but only time will tell. What are your thoughts? Is the market’s recovery finally underway after nearly a decade, or do we have a bit more waiting to do? Join the conversation with us on Twitter.

photo courtesy of extranoise

Interview with Corinne Lyall
Broker/Owner of Calgary’s Royal LePage Benchmark

Why did you decide to switch transaction management providers?

We had been dissatisfied for quite some time with our original document management provider. The system had difficulties integrating with our transaction management/accounting software and we had to almost check every deal to ensure it was imported correctly. When we were told that our transaction management provider was selling the business and that we were going to have to switch systems anyway, we really thought we should research what other options were available.

What were you looking for in a transaction and document management provider?

Our office administration staff and I had some lengthy discussions about what we were looking for from our accounting system, and really it came down to efficiency, a good document management program, and a simple conveyancing system.  We wanted something that we didn’t have to hire someone else to manage, a system easy for the agents and office staff to use… and we really didn’t want to have to import from other systems or perform duplicate entry.

What differences have you experienced since you’ve “Made the Switch” to Enviromint?

We certainly have received many less complaints with the new system – if any – and we were impressed at how Marc and the team tried to make the actual conversion process as smooth as possible. They did a great job converting us and they really took the time to make sure everything was running smoothly with our administration team before we officially launched it to the agents.

Since the transition, it has been much easier to manage our transactions and we feel secure knowing that at the end of the day we weren’t going to lose sight of missing documents or commissions.

The level of customer service we experienced from the team over at Enviromint from the first day we did a walk through demo of their solution was very detailed and thorough.  I think the first demo was over 2 hours long mainly because they patiently answered all of our questions!  Comparatively from our previous experience with our transaction management software, we are able to get a hold of someone almost immediately when there is a problem.  That is appreciated since our transactions have to be dealt with in a timely manner.

Did your agents have a good experience making the switch?

Everyone knows how hard it can be to change. It’s not something anyone likes because naturally we get comfortable with doing things a certain way. It was a big concern of mine that not only would we have a lot to learn on the administration side, but we would also have a lot of training to do with the agents. Again, we were pleasantly surprised. The amount of positive feedback we had coming in was reassuring. We heard everything from it’s easy to use, to the document storage – and conveyancing notes – have saved my butt.

What advice do you have for other broker/owners who are thinking about switching providers?

If you’re thinking about switching providers for any reason…customer service, product limitations, whatever, it’s not in your head.  You probably can do it more efficiently and there are better service providers out there. Specifically, I have enjoyed how responsive the Enviromint team has been in responding and molding the system to our needs – each brokerage and industry community manages their transactions differently and it is important to us that it fits our individual requirements.  It seems like such a time consuming and arduous process, but I am very happy we made the transition.  

Technology and industrialization have played a large role in the past century, carrying humanity to its current state. We have houses as big and creative as we want, with more power and air conditioning units than we could ever need, with fast cars in the driveway…you get the idea. But, every once in a while, amidst this grid of technological infrastructure, some choose to take things back a notch, and explore the concepts of construction through more natural and sustainable methods.

One example of these is a very unique village resort in the Himalayas built by dry-stacking wood and stone without the use of cement. Now, by the sounds of it, this place can’t possibly that magical without the basic constructive element of cement…prepare to be amazed: http://www.ecofriend.com/himalayan-resort-made-dry-stacking-stone-wood-cement.html Not only is the village resort functional, but aesthetically gorgeous, architecturally marvelous, and a truly appealing vacation spot.

The notion of construction through post-dated methods seems so foreign to us, but why? Humans inhabited the earth and built many astounding things without the modern technological advances we’ve made, meaning these methods were discarded through progressiveness; however it’s not to say that these methods shouldn’t be re-visited, as they are clearly applicable to modern construction when looking at the village mentioned above.

Just because something new comes along to replace the old doesn’t mean the old needs to be so rapidly discarded. We should be re-visiting previous methods more often for menial and advanced tasks, because these methods clearly worked before, definitely could do so again. If we can build playgrounds out of recycled potato peels and veggie oil, there shouldn’t be any reason for us to explore more eco-friendly construction methods as humanity advances.

photo courtesy of http://www.ecofriend.com/himalayan-resort-made-dry-stacking-stone-wood-cement.html

 

 

 

 

 

Today, Canada’s housing market took a strange turn that isn’t sitting quite right with some, and appeases others. The changes that took place were that the CMHC (Canadian Mortgage and Housing Corporation), who oversee and insure the vast majority of Canadian mortgages, has lowered the maximum amortization period from 30 years, to 25 years.

Now, this is being done to “ensure Canadians aren’t taking on more debt than they can afford“; however little to the CMHC’s concerns, this change will be seriously detrimental to new home buyers, and especially young ones. This decreased cap on amortization periods will do nothing but increase mortgage payments for new buyers, and become a large market deterrent, especially when you consider that 40 per cent of new mortgages last year were amortized over 30 years. Despite the government’s attempt to bring things back to the way they were in 2006 (a 25 year maximum amortization was in place before the Conservative government took over in 2006 and extended these periods to 40 years, and have since been shrinking back) it doesn’t seem that this may be the right approach to stabilize Canada’s barely recovering housing market. The Canadian real estate is only very recently beginning to recover, but this doesn’t mean that it’s stable, or recovered, so introducing more buying deterrents seems to be an unwise move…

What are your thoughts on this situation? Is this a good or bad decision to be made? Will the housing market continue to recover despite this deterring situation? Join the conversation with us on Twitter.

photo courtesy of twicepix